Final answer:
Astrology is a pseudoscience and should not be confused with the legitimate science of astronomy, which is concerned with the study of celestial objects and phenomena. Kepler's laws of planetary motion describe how a satellite's speed varies along its orbit, and these laws apply generally, even when a planet-satellite system is not completely isolated. Astrology's use of planetary positions does not equate to it being a natural science.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "Astrology imitates the real science of astronomy by referring to planetary bodies in orbit" is false. Astrology is often confused with astronomy, but they are fundamentally different. Astrology is a pseudoscience that claims to discern information about human affairs and terrestrial events by studying the movements and relative positions of celestial objects. However, this has no scientific basis and is not considered a natural science like astronomy, which is the legitimate scientific study of celestial bodies, such as stars, planets, comets, and galaxies, and phenomena that originate outside the Earth's atmosphere.
According to Kepler's laws of planetary motion, it is true that a satellite increases its speed as it approaches its parent body and decreases its speed as it moves away. This is because of the conservation of angular momentum, which dictates that as the satellite moves closer to the body it's orbiting, it has to travel faster to maintain its orbital path.
Furthermore, while Kepler's laws generally apply to isolated two-body planet-satellite systems, in reality, other massive objects can have an influence, but these effects are typically small and can be considered negligible in many situations. Therefore, the statement that "A planet-satellite system must be isolated from other massive objects to follow Kepler's laws of planetary motion" is false; these laws can be applied even when other objects are present, though there may be some perturbations.
The heliocentric model helped us understand the underlying order of the 'complex' apparent motions of the wandering planets. Through careful observation and research, historically exemplified by scientists like Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler, the predictable patterns of celestial motion have been thoroughly documented, supporting the concept that careful data collection is essential for good science.
As for astrology, although it makes use of planetary positions, such as those at the time of one's birth, it does not employ scientific methods to prove a direct causal relationship with human affairs. The only scientifically recognized influence that planets have on Earth is through gravity. Hence, the statement claiming astrology as a natural science because it deals with observations and predictions of celestial events is false.