Final answer:
The author's claim is that school suspensions are ineffective and alternative approaches are needed, corresponding with option B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author's claim regarding school suspensions is that they are ineffective, and there is a need for better alternatives. This claim aligns with option B, which states that school suspensions are ineffective, and alternative approaches are needed. The rationale behind this claim is that suspensions may not address the underlying issues leading to the behavioral problems and can disrupt the educational process of the suspended student, often without providing the support or intervention necessary to change the behavior.
Contemporary education discussions include various strategies to improve school discipline and student outcomes. Proposals such as positive reinforcement, more engaging educational environments, and parental involvement are gaining traction over traditional punitive approaches like suspensions.
However, there is controversy regarding the best methods to deal with behavioral issues in schools. The conversation often involves balancing the needs of individual students with maintaining an optimal learning environment for all students. While opponents of suspensions may propose that funding is better utilized by improving general public schools, proponents of alternative measures may argue for the necessity to address student behavior through more constructive and supportive means.