Final answer:
The case 'Presser v. Illinois, 1886' addressed the constitutionality of an Illinois law that restricts the formation of personal military organizations by civilians, which the Supreme Court upheld. It does not deal directly with freedom of speech or the press but is related to civil liberties under the First Amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case "Presser v. Illinois, 1886" is about an Illinois law that prohibits common citizens from forming personal military organizations and parading. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law, stating it does not infringe on the personal right to keep and bear arms. This case falls under the category of civil liberties related to the First Amendment, specifically in relation to the freedom of assembly.
Whereas freedom of speech and the press is a critically important right, the Presser case does not directly deal with this facet of the First Amendment. Contrary to Presser v. Illinois, important landmark cases such as Near v. Minnesota and Gitlow v. New York addressed the issues of press freedoms and the application of First Amendment rights to the states respectively.
Overall, Presser v. Illinois focused on the distinction between individual freedoms and the state's power to regulate potentially harmful activities such as unauthorized military formations.