Final answer:
Both academics and individuals recognize the role of cultural practices in shaping identity. Academics focus on historical context and objective analysis, while individuals prioritize personal experiences and subjective connections. Both perspectives ultimately consider the impact of society and family on one's cultural identity.
Step-by-step explanation:
When discussing the similarities between how cultural identity is viewed by an academic and by an individual, it is essential to recognize that both perspectives involve interpretations of cultural experiences, though they may focus on different aspects. Academics tend to emphasize historical context and an objective analysis of cultural systems, including values, traditions, and norms. Individuals often focus on personal experiences and subjective connections to their cultural identity, which may include personal achievements and a sense of belonging within a group. Despite these differences, both academics and individuals acknowledge the influence of cultural practices and the ways in which society and family shape an individual's cultural identity.
For example, academics might analyze cultural identity using theoretical approaches such as functionalist, conflict, or interactionist perspectives to understand societal patterns and cultural phenomena. However, individuals shape their cultural identities through lived experiences and personal interactions that may challenge, reinforce, or change their beliefs. The cultural-comparative, indigenous, and combined approaches are methods used in academic research to assess the universality and cultural specifics of personality traits shaped by these cultural identities.