Final answer:
Exit West challenges the notion of national borders and rights of states versus the rights of individuals, particularly emphasizing the human right to freedom of movement and the struggle for belonging in the face of global displacement.
Step-by-step explanation:
One right that is affirmed or challenged in Exit West is the right of individuals to seek better lives through migration, which in turn interrogates the concept of national borders and the rights of states versus the rights of individuals. In the story, the characters use magical doors to migrate to safer or better places instantly, bypassing traditional migration routes and the legal and physical barriers that comprise them. This narrative device challenges the conventional understanding of migration and prompts reflection on the rigidity of borders and the human right to freedom of movement.
Another pivotal right discussed is the right to belong, which is explored throughout the text in various contexts. Characters struggle with issues of acceptance, legitimacy, and the often contentious dichotomy between 'us' and 'them,' particularly in scenarios of migration and cultural assimilation. The characters in the novel are searching for a place where they can establish their lives free from the fear of war and persecution, which is a fundamental human desire for belonging and safety. Consequently, Exit West becomes a powerful commentary on the struggle for these universal rights amidst global displacement.