Final answer:
Samaria's social structure displayed interaction with neighbors and polytheistic beliefs, and was marked by an increasing complexity in social hierarchy, with governance evolving from tribal to monarchic under leaders such as David and Solomon.
Step-by-step explanation:
An aspect of social structure in Samaria that is noteworthy is the interaction with neighboring peoples and the practice of polytheism. The capital of the northern kingdom of Israel was the city of Samaria, and its inhabitants, known as Samaritans, frequently interacted with their neighboring regions. Unlike the southern kingdom of Judah, which was more conservative and where the Prophetic Movement started, the Samaritans were engaged in a polytheistic practice despite the growing monotheistic movement centered around the worship of Yahweh.
The nature of governance and social divisions were also emblematic of Samaria’s social hierarchy, which was evolving at that time. The Hebrews, who had formed a kingdom called Israel to defend against oppressions like those from the Philistines, had established a monarchy with Saul and later with the more successful kings like David and Solomon. The latter, King Solomon, evidently displayed a social structure that included trade relationships, taxation of trade and subjects, and building projects, which signal a developing complexity in the society's stratification and economy.