Question

Answer the following questions about the reading on Olney's perspective:

According to Olney, what is necessary to prevent a nation from deteriorating?
What surprises Olney about the behavior of the U.S. government?
In general, how does Olney feel about America's foreign policy?
In the early 20th century, could the United States truly be considered a "colonizing power," as Olney claims?
How does this article relate to the notion of empire building?

Answer 1

According to Olney, preventing a nation from deteriorating requires a strong, centralized government that can effectively manage economic and social forces.

Step-by-step explanation:

Olney emphasizes the necessity of a robust and centralized government to prevent a nation from deteriorating. He argues that such a government is crucial for managing the complex economic and social forces that could otherwise lead to decline.

Olney expresses surprise about the U.S. government's behavior, particularly its inability to assert control over territories it acquires. He highlights instances where the government appears to lack effective governance in newly acquired areas.

In general, Olney appears critical of America's foreign policy, suggesting that it lacks a coherent strategy and fails to effectively manage the challenges associated with acquiring new territories.

Olney claims that in the early 20th century, the United States could be considered a "colonizing power" due to its territorial acquisitions and attempts to exert influence in Latin America.

This article relates to the notion of empire building by discussing the U.S. government's actions in acquiring territories and managing them. Olney's perspective sheds light on the challenges and criticisms associated with the United States' efforts in expanding its influence during the early 20th century.