143k views
1 vote
Which should a critical annotation do?

a. support the author's conclusions
b. summarize the text
c. paraphrase the text
d. contradict the author's conclusions

User Hegash
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

A critical annotation should summarize, paraphrase, and explain a text in your own words, assessing its quality and relevance to the topic, which may include supporting or contradicting the author's conclusions.

Step-by-step explanation:

A critical annotation should evaluate and analyze a reading selection, which includes summarizing the text, paraphrasing the content, and explaining the essential information in your own words. It also involves an analysis of the source and a reflection on how the source will be used in your work. Importantly, a critical annotation should assess the source's quality and relevance to your topic. This means it might support the author's conclusions, but it can also include contradictions if the evidence or analysis suggests alternative interpretations.A critical annotation should support the author's conclusions. It should provide evidence from the text to back up the author's claims and arguments. By analyzing and evaluating the text, a critical annotation helps the reader understand and appreciate the author's perspective.

User AxelWass
by
8.2k points