Final answer:
The Cherokee's attempt to use legal means to resist removal reflects their organized political strategies and exposes the limitations of the judicial branch in enforcing rulings against the executive's will, culminating in the forced relocation known as the Trail of Tears.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the efforts of the Cherokee to prevent their forced removal through the judicial system, we can infer several key points about the tribe's approach and the American legal and political landscape of the time. Firstly, the Cherokee sought a peaceful and lawful resolution by challenging the legality of removal in court, emphasizing their organised and civilised political structure. They pursued justice through the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, where they were not considered a foreign nation, and subsequently, Worcester v. Georgia, which they won.
However, despite the Supreme Court ruling that only the national government had authority in Indian affairs, the inability of the judiciary to enforce its decision coupled with the executive branch's determination to proceed with removal under President Andrew Jackson led to the tragic outcome known as the Trail of Tears.