Final answer:
The most likely major advantage of group-aided decision making is that the decision will be more readily accepted by the group. However, it is important to be cautious of disadvantages like groupthink, which can undermine the decision process by creating a false consensus. Strategic avoidance of these pitfalls can lead to more effective and balanced group decision-making outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Among the list of options for potential advantages of group-aided decision making, the most significant is likely 'd. The likelihood that the decision will be accepted increases.' This is because when decisions are made collaboratively, there's typically a greater sense of ownership and agreement among those involved in the making of the decision. This acceptance is critical for effective implementation and support within the group or organization.
On the contrary, aspects like social pressure, goal displacement, hidden agendas, and groupthink can become disadvantages of group decision making. For instance, groupthink is a phenomenon where the desire for harmony or conformity within a group leads to irrational decision-making outcomes. It occurs when members of a group attempt to minimize conflict and reach a consensus without critically evaluating alternative viewpoints, often leading to poor decisions. Strategies to avoid groupthink include seeking outside opinions, voting privately, and the leader withholding their position until all views are voiced.
Group polarization is another phenomenon that strengthens a group's prevailing attitudes. In the context of decision making, it highlights the importance of considering diverse perspectives and the impact this can have on the extremity of the group's stance. Awareness and preventive strategies are essential to ensure decisions are made based on comprehensive evaluations rather than the influence of conformity and consensus seeking.