Final answer:
In a job design where each worker is responsible for assembling a different part on an automated assembly line, the most likely outcome is that it will be easy to train workers. These tasks are designed for specialization, which can enhance productivity and quality but might limit job satisfaction and creativity due to their repetitive nature.
Step-by-step explanation:
If jobs are designed so that each worker assembles a different part of a product on an automated assembly line, the job design is most likely to make it easy to train workers. This method leverages the principle that specialization allows workers to learn tasks more quickly and with greater efficiency. However, such jobs tend to be repetitive and not intrinsically rewarding, which might not lead to high levels of job satisfaction or creativity. The repetitive nature of the work often reduces the sense of personal contribution to the finished product and can render the job monotonous.
Moreover, while specialized tasks can lead to better quality and productivity, they might not be highly challenging since the tasks are typically designed to be simple to master. Specialization on an assembly line does lead to efficient production and can sometimes offer opportunities for workers to suggest improvements, but these suggestions would be within a narrow scope rather than broad creative changes.