Final Answer:
A recent study from the fbi of crime statistics in elementary schools across the nation shows that since this game’s release bullying has gone way up is d) red herring.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement commits a red herring fallacy, diverting attention from the main point by introducing irrelevant information. While discussing the purported increase in bullying since the release of a game, the reference to an FBI study on crime statistics in elementary schools serves as a distraction. This diversionary tactic aims to lend an air of authority and credibility to the argument by invoking the FBI, but the crime statistics are not directly related to the claim about bullying.
In a red herring fallacy, the introduced information may be true or accurate but is ultimately irrelevant to the issue at hand. The primary objective is to shift the focus of the discussion and lead the audience away from the main argument. In this case, the mention of FBI crime statistics does not establish a causal link between the game's release and an increase in bullying. It introduces a tangential topic that may evoke concern but fails to address the core claim adequately.
Critical thinking requires staying focused on the central issue and evaluating arguments based on relevant evidence. In this context, identifying the red herring fallacy highlights the need to distinguish between information that genuinely supports a claim and information inserted to distract or mislead, as seen in the diversionary tactic of referencing unrelated FBI crime statistics.
So, the correct option is d) red herring.