Final answer:
National and state decisions regarding immigration have been a point of contention, with issues surrounding federal vs. state powers, civil rights abuses, and diverse policy approaches such as Arizona's stringent immigration laws versus California's supportive measures for undocumented immigrants.
Step-by-step explanation:
Decisions by National and State Governments on Immigration
National and state governments have made various decisions related to immigration and civil rights issues. Immigration policy has been debated extensively, with significant controversy arising from bills in states such as Arizona and California. Historically, the U.S. government has made attempts to control immigration and maintain security, which has led to civil rights challenges such as the criminalization of undocumented immigrants and protests against such measures.
Arizona v. United States
In 2012, the Supreme Court case, Arizona v. United States, served as a critical example by reaffirming federal supremacy on immigration issues. The Supreme Court struck down most provisions of Arizona's contentious immigration law but upheld the 'show me your papers' section with a warning against potential civil rights abuses like racial profiling.
California Immigrant Resilience Fund
During the COVID-19 pandemic, California set an example of supporting undocumented residents by establishing the California Immigrant Resilience Fund to aid those not eligible for other COVID-19 programs, contrasting with restrictive state immigration policies.
These examples illustrate the tension between federal and state powers regarding immigration, which remains a hotly debated civil rights issue mirroring historical civil rights challenges.