Question

Marshall's ruling in worcester v. georgia (1832) failed to help the cherokee because the court also ruled that the cherokees had to settle the matter with georgia, with no assistance from the federal government. the court ignored the federal removal act of 1830 in their decision. the court refused to grant the cherokees sovereign status. georgia used the doctrine of nullification to have the ruling vacated.

Answer 1

In Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee and established tribal sovereignty. However, the ruling failed to stop the forced removal of the Cherokee and Georgia nullified the decision.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall ruled in favor of Samuel Worcester and the Cherokee Nation, establishing the principle of tribal sovereignty. However, Marshall's ruling failed to help the Cherokee in their efforts to prevent removal.

The court stated that the Cherokee had to settle the matter with Georgia and could not rely on assistance from the federal government. They also refused to grant the Cherokee sovereign status. Furthermore, Georgia used the doctrine of nullification to have the ruling vacated.