Final answer:
Based on the requirements, options A and B are the best choices for designing and implementing the parts master. Option A focuses on storing data in Salesforce with Salesforce Data Loader, and option B leverages the Salesforce price book and reporting with API integrations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The requirements stated involve selecting a parts master to hold all parts data, a method to upload and download this data, corresponding price book entries for each part, the availability of parts data for integrated external systems, and accessibility of this data for reporting without additional CPQ Cloud licenses.
Given these requirements, the two options to choose from for designing and implementing the parts master are:
- A. Store all the parts data in Salesforce and use the Salesforce Data Loader tool to upload and download the parts data. This satisfies the requirement of having a single parts master and provides tools for data upload and download.
- B. Use the Salesforce price book and reporting and integrate with the APIs to make all parts data available in other external systems. This option addresses the need for price book entries, availability for external systems, and reporting within the product development team without the need for additional CPQ Cloud licenses.
Options C and D do not meet the full criteria as these would limit the availability of the parts data to systems outside of CPQ Cloud or incur additional costs for reporting capabilities.