Final answer:
The Kalish analysis likely refers to understanding the mindset of oppressors who feel entitled to violent revenge when their perceived social standing is threatened, drawing on historical examples and critical race and gender theory.
Step-by-step explanation:
The passage refers to a phenomenon similar to what is known in critical race and gender theory where oppressors possess an undue sense of power and entitlement. This is elaborated upon through historical examples such as the opposition to women's suffrage and the reluctance to expand rights for African Americans during Reconstruction. In these contexts, men and whites, respectively, were assumed to have unchallenged authority that protected their social status. Kalish analysis likely refers to a study of this mindset, which can lead to reactionary violence when individuals feel their socially entitled revenge is justified.
In another example, revenge motivated the Mourning Wars in the Northeast, reflecting the pursuit of power and prestige through violence. The acceptance of such brutal acts was deeply ingrained in the culture, with outcomes including torture and even consumption of the enemy after death, perceived as a means of ingesting strength or maintaining cosmic order. Critical race and gender theorists suggest that being oppressed results in a more complex and richer epistemology, allowing for greater understanding and knowledge in contrast to the oppressors' worldview.
These historical and theoretical frameworks highlight the deeply entrenched systems of oppression and the resulting normalized violence, which are perpetuated by a misguided sense of entitlement driven by class, race, or gender superiority.