Final answer:
False, omitting facts without a legal or governmental imperative can lead to biased reporting, and careful consideration is required when handling classified information.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Facts or details requiring reports to be classified should be omitted'. Rather than omitting facts, reporters and media outlets are responsible for handling sensitive information, particularly classified materials, with care.
In certain situations, such as matters of national security, the government may request redaction or omission of specific details to prevent harm to the country or to individuals, like troops or covert operatives. It's critical for reports and analytical materials to maintain fidelity to truth and accuracy, and this includes carefully deciding what information is shared with the public.
However, outright omitting facts without any governmental or legal imperative could lead to biased reporting or misrepresentation of situations, much like the case involving the misrepresentation of Katie Holmes in the Star magazine incident.
This underscores the importance of facts in reporting and the potential consequences of neglecting accuracy.