Question

According to Singer and Baer, increases in rates of cancer can be explained in part by which of the following?

A. The deliberate actions of companies or institutions that test, sell or dispose of harmful substances without proper concern for those they affect.
B. Bad luck, or, what some people refer to as, a lack of faith.
C. The way workers usually refuse to wear masks when working with harmful substances.
D. Since scientists don't know what causes cancer it is impossible to explain rates of increase.

Answer 1

Increases in cancer rates according to Singer and Baer can be partially attributed to genetic mutations due to exposure to carcinogens and lifestyle choices. These include smoking, diet, and environmental exposures, which are linked to the actions of certain companies or institutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation of Cancer Rate Increases According to Singer and Baer

According to Singer and Baer, increases in rates of cancer can be explained by various factors including genetic mutations either due to errors in DNA replication or exposure to carcinogens. These carcinogens can be substances or radiations like tobacco smoke, processed meats, asbestos, and ultraviolet radiation. Environmental risk factors, such as exposure to pollutants like radon and air pollution, can also increase the risk. Hence, the increases in cancer rates can be partially explained by environmental exposures and individuals' lifestyle choices, like smoking, diet, and physical inactivity.

Based on this information, option A seems most aligned with Singer and Baer's argument, since it involves the deliberate actions of companies or institutions regarding harmful substances, which echoes the theme of exposure to environmental carcinogens.