Final answer:
The analyst should inspect the server certificate and simulate SSL/TLS handshakes to reproduce the findings about supported protocols and cipher suites. This will verify TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV support, POODLE vulnerability, weak PFS presence, and implement OCSP stapling.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student is asking which method should be used to comprehensively reproduce the security findings related to the bank's external website's encryption protocols and cipher suites. Considering the details provided, the best course of action would be to inspect the server certificate and simulate SSL/TLS handshakes for enumeration. This process will allow the security analyst to identify the supported protocols, cipher suites, and any vulnerabilities like POODLE (related to SSLv3) or issues with weak PFS (Perfect Forward Secrecy).
To perform this task, the analyst might use tools like OpenSSL or testssl.sh to conduct a thorough analysis of the encryption settings. Simulating handshakes will reveal whether TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV is supported, ensuring the protection against downgrading attacks is effective. Additionally, this approach will validate the implementation of OCSP stapling and provide an overall security posture of the TLS implementation on the banking website.
It is crucial to perform these analyses in a controlled and ethical manner, in compliance with legal standards and organizational policies. Reproducing these findings will help the analyst confirm the vulnerabilities and move forward with remediating the issues to secure the bank's website.