105k views
5 votes
A security appliance vendor is reviewing an RFP that is requesting solutions for the defense of a set of web-based applications. This RFP is from a financial institution with very strict performance requirements. The vendor would like to respond with its solutions.

Before responding, which of the following factors is MOST likely to have an adverse effect on the vendor's qualifications?

A. The solution employs threat information-sharing capabilities using a proprietary data model.
B. The RFP is issued by a financial institution that is headquartered outside of the vendor's own country.
C. The overall solution proposed by the vendor comes in less that the TCO parameter in the RFP.
D. The vendor's proposed solution operates below the KPPs indicated in the RFP.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The most likely factor that would have an adverse effect on the vendor's qualifications is if their proposed solution operates below the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) indicated in the RFP.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most likely factor that would have an adverse effect on the vendor's qualifications is option D: The vendor's proposed solution operates below the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) indicated in the Request for Proposal (RFP).

A financial institution with strict performance requirements would expect the vendor's solution to meet or exceed the KPPs specified in the RFP. If the vendor's proposed solution falls below these parameters, it may not meet the performance requirements of the financial institution, which could lead to the vendor being disqualified.

For example, if the financial institution requires a certain level of response time or throughput for the web-based applications and the vendor's solution does not meet these performance criteria, it would be considered a negative factor and could impact the vendor's qualifications.

User Alfred Luu
by
7.3k points