137k views
3 votes
Lia must work at least 5 hours per week in the restaurant, so the inequality is: r ≥ 5 2. lia's parents allow her to work a maximum of 15 hours overall, so the inequality is: r y ≤ 15 3. lia's goal is to earn at least $120 per week, so the inequality is: 8r 12y ≥ 120

User Sqe
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The discussion revolves around the labor-leisure budget constraint and the impact of a government assistance program on a single-parent family's income and work hours. It highlights the different choices the family can make regarding the trade-off between work and leisure and how these choices are influenced by the design of the program.

Step-by-step explanation:

The concept described in the question relates to the labor-leisure budget constraint in economics, which is particularly applied in this scenario to a single-parent family. The discussion involves analyzing the trade-off between leisure and labor, and how government programs can affect a family's income through work. For example, without assistance, a single mother earning $8 per hour can work up to 2,500 hours a year, earning a maximum of $20,000. If she chooses to work 40 hours a week for 50 weeks, she will earn $16,000 and have 500 hours of leisure. On the other hand, the introduction of a government program that guarantees a base income but decreases benefits as earned income rises creates a different incentive structure. At an effective income of $4 per hour due to the 50% reduction in government assistance per dollar earned, the family could still potentially reach an income of $28,000, combining work and government support.

User Kums
by
6.9k points