Final answer:
Whites who killed no one could still be complicit in lynchings through their acceptance or support of the act, which demonstrated their involvement in illegal activity and wrongdoing.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the history of lynchings, there were cases where whites who did not directly participate in the killing were still complicit in the act. This complicity can be seen in several ways. Firstly, there was a widespread acceptance or indifference among whites towards the act of lynching, which created an environment that allowed it to continue. Additionally, white communities often rallied around the accuser, even if the charges were unfounded or exaggerated, demonstrating their support for the act of lynching. Lastly, the act of lynching itself served as a display of white supremacy, with whites participating in the mob violence to reaffirm their dominance over African Americans.