82.4k views
4 votes
What indicates that whites who killed no one were in fact complicit (involved with others in an illegal activity or wrongdoing) in lynchings?

User Roman SL
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer: Lynchings were violent public acts that white people used to terrorize and control. White people used racial terror lynching as a tool to instill fear in the broader Black community. Lynchings were not merely retaliation for a specific crime.

Step-by-step explanation:

I think this is right, but I don't know for sure.

I hope this helped,

Kaityln Dyer,

User Dundar
by
7.5k points
2 votes

Final answer:

Whites who killed no one could still be complicit in lynchings through their acceptance or support of the act, which demonstrated their involvement in illegal activity and wrongdoing.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the history of lynchings, there were cases where whites who did not directly participate in the killing were still complicit in the act. This complicity can be seen in several ways. Firstly, there was a widespread acceptance or indifference among whites towards the act of lynching, which created an environment that allowed it to continue. Additionally, white communities often rallied around the accuser, even if the charges were unfounded or exaggerated, demonstrating their support for the act of lynching. Lastly, the act of lynching itself served as a display of white supremacy, with whites participating in the mob violence to reaffirm their dominance over African Americans.

User Kona
by
7.5k points