Final answer:
The term 'centrifugal roles' is not a recognized type of connection role in social studies; the recognized types are self-reciprocating and reciprocating roles, which describe interactions in relationships.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of social studies and relationship dynamics, the term 'centrifugal roles' is not recognized as a standard type of connection role. Typically, we talk about self-reciprocating roles and reciprocating roles when discussing relationships in sociology or psychology.
Self-reciprocating roles refer to a role in which an individual provides benefits to themselves, often through self-care or self-management behaviors.
On the other hand, reciprocating roles involve two or more parties where actions by one party are responded to with similar or equivalent actions by the other party, thus creating a loop of reciprocal interaction.
Centrifugal forces, in contrast, are a concept from physics relating to the outward force experienced by an object moving in a circular path, and this does not relate to connection roles in social dynamics.