Final answer:
Customization can indeed lead to more security vulnerabilities than configuration because it involves altering or adding new features that may not be as rigorously tested for security.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement “Customization can contain more security vulnerabilities than a configuration approach” is True. Customization involves altering the standard functionality or adding new features to a system, which can introduce new security risks. The development of custom components may not undergo the same rigorous security testing as the core system, making it prone to vulnerabilities. Conversely, configuration generally involves adjusting settings within the existing parameters of a system and tends to be safer because it relies on tested and supported features.
The statement is true. Customization can introduce more security vulnerabilities compared to a configuration approach.When customizing software or systems, there is a greater chance of introducing errors or misconfigurations that can be exploited by attackers.A common example is when website administrators modify the source code of a Content Management System (CMS) to meet specific requirements. If the customization is not properly implemented, it can create security weaknesses that may expose sensitive information or allow unauthorized access.