Final answer:
The value of basic science is foundational for applied science, and both are necessary for scientific advancement. Basic science leads to grand innovations while applied science solves real-world problems, and a balance is essential for progress.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate between the value of basic science and applied science is ongoing, with some individuals questioning the purpose of science if we can apply it to solving specific problems or bettering our lives.
Basic science possesses an intrinsic value that has historically been foundational in leading to incredible applications that advance our civilization. Innovations such as space travel, advanced medical treatments, wireless communication, and new super materials have all sprung from the bedrock of basic scientific knowledge.
On the other hand, applied science focuses on using scientific knowledge to address real-world issues, which is indispensable for immediate solutions. It relies on basic science for the necessary understanding to develop new technologies or strategies. These approaches to science are not mutually exclusive, and both are essential for the comprehensive progression of science as a whole and in addressing the multitude of challenges humanity faces.
A harmonious balance between basic science, which builds a repository of knowledge, and applied science, which tackles immediate challenges, is necessary. Without this balance, we may not have the depth of knowledge to support sustainable and revolutionary solutions, nor would we be able to address urgent matters that require immediate scientific intervention.