133k views
1 vote
A security engineer is attempting to convey the importance of including job rotation in a company's standard security policies. Which of the following would be the BEST justification?

A. Making employees rotate through jobs ensures succession plans can be implemented and prevents single points of failure.

B. Forcing different people to perform the same job minimizes the amount of time malicious actions go undetected by forcing malicious actors to attempt collusion between two or more people.

C. Administrators and engineers who perform multiple job functions throughout the day benefit from being cross-trained in new job areas.

D. It eliminates the need to share administrative account passwords because employees gain administrative rights as they rotate into a new job area.

User Xvtk
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Including job rotation in security policies is primarily justified by its ability to make fraudulent activities harder to execute without detection, as it necessitates collusion between individuals, thereby increasing the security of the organization.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best justification for including job rotation in a company's standard security policies would be that it minimizes the risk of fraudulent activity going undetected by making it more difficult for a single malicious actor to operate without collusion. This strategy requires multiple personnel to be familiar with each role, increasing the likelihood that fraudulent activities would be detected when responsibilities are handed over to the next person. It also aids in the detection of inconsistencies or irregularities that may indicate security breaches or fraud. Job rotation does not only have security benefits; it can also help with succession planning and prevent single points of failure within an organization by ensuring that multiple employees are trained and capable of performing various essential roles.

User MikeWu
by
7.9k points