Final Answer:
Those words "provide substantial historical context and artifacts" made this a critical discovery; they are strong evidence that David really lived.
Step-by-step explanation:
The phrase "provide substantial historical context and artifacts" highlights the importance of the discovered evidence. It indicates that the discovery includes not just written records but also physical objects or remains that contribute significantly to understanding the historical period associated with David. The use of "substantial" suggests that the evidence is abundant, comprehensive, and diverse, covering various aspects of David's era.
The term "critical discovery" underscores the pivotal nature of this finding in the study of David's existence. It suggests that this discovery is essential, perhaps even indispensable, in corroborating David's historical reality. Without it, the understanding of David's existence might have been incomplete or uncertain, emphasizing the importance of this evidence in the broader context of historical verification.
The phrase "strong evidence that David really lived" emphasizes the potency and credibility of the uncovered artifacts and historical context. By describing the evidence as "strong," it suggests that it is compelling, reliable, and persuasive in establishing the actuality of David's existence. These words convey a sense of confidence in the authenticity of the evidence and its role in affirming David as a historically tangible figure.
In essence, the specific choice of words "provide substantial historical context and artifacts" in the sentence emphasizes the richness and breadth of the evidence discovered, while the phrase "strong evidence that David really lived" underscores its potency in solidifying David's existence within the historical record. These words collectively contribute to affirming David's historical reality through comprehensive, tangible, and persuasive evidence.