Final answer:
In a series where the first term is an empty class, increasing its extension does not affect the empty term itself but depends on the subsequent terms. The extension means adding elements, which starts with the next terms, as the first term adds no elements. The effect on the series depends on whether the following terms are dependent on the first.
Step-by-step explanation:
When pondering what happens to a series of terms in which the first term has an empty class as we attempt to increase the extension, it's important to clarify the context of the terms. In set theory and logic, a class (or set) that is empty is one that contains no elements. Therefore, if the first term of a series represents an empty class, there is nothing to extend because there are no elements to begin with. Increasing the extension typically means to add more elements to a class or set. However, with an empty class, this process begins at the subsequent term in the series because the first term cannot contribute any elements. The practical effect on the series depends on the nature of the terms that follow the first.
For instance, in a mathematical series, if the first term is zero or an empty set and the following terms are dependent on the first, they may also be affected, potentially resulting with additional empty or zero values. On the other hand, if the terms are independent, the series may simply progress ignoring the initial empty class. The overall properties of the series, such as convergence or divergence, would be determined by the non-empty terms.
In essence, the presence of an empty first term does not inherently prevent a series from being extended, but it does not contribute anything to its extension. The impact really falls on how subsequent terms are defined and interact with the empty class.