Final answer:
It is false that the English takeover of New Amsterdam led to less economic freedom for women as they retained the right to certain Dutch legal customs. Overall, women in the eighteenth-century America had limited economic rights and no right to vote, but post-takeover, there was a growing movement for legal and educational equality.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the English takeover and rule of New Amsterdam meant less economic freedom for women is generally considered to be false. During the Dutch rule of New Amsterdam, before it became New York, the legal status of married women, known as coverture, meant that a married woman had no independent economic status separate from her husband. She could not conduct business or own property independently. Following the English takeover, the Dutch settlers were granted the right to maintain Dutch legal customs, which included some economic privileges for women, though still significantly limited.
More broadly, in eighteenth-century America, no state constitution granted women the right to vote in the Revolutionary Era. Moreover, the role of women and their participation in public and economic life continued to evolve after the English takeover, with some women, particularly from elite circles, beginning to advocate for equality under the law and for educational opportunities comparable to those of men.