Final answer:
A key advantage of using a chosen officer in ADR is ensuring an objective perspective through the selection of a neutral, competent decision-maker. This contributes to fair and timely justice, reduces expenses, and offers quicker resolutions compared to traditional litigation.
Step-by-step explanation:
An advantage of using a chosen officer in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is ensuring an objective perspective. This is because a neutral decision-maker, selected for their competence and impartiality, can approach a dispute without pre-existing biases or interests, focusing solely on the facts and applicable laws or rules. ADR offers an accessible and impartial way of resolving disputes, which is essential for delivering justice in a timely and ethical manner.
Furthermore, by utilizing professional human resources in ADR, biases can be further reduced, thereby promoting fairness. This is supported by research that identified higher levels of discrimination in the hiring process by smaller employers, due to less professionalized HR functions, compared to larger organizations with more resources and experience in managing a diverse workforce.
In addition to promoting objectivity, chosen officers may help in reducing expenses associated with traditional litigation by minimizing transaction costs and streamlining the process, therefore providing quicker results. This accelerates decision-making and improves outcomes for all parties involved.