151k views
5 votes
A business partner is leading an employee committee tasked with developing a program of employee appreciation events. Two of the committee members are embroiled in what has become personal antagonism. They interrupt each other during meetings and are rude in front of the others. How could the business partner have best avoided this situation?

Ground rules for behavior in meetings should have been established at the first meeting.
The business partner should ask the employees' managers to replace them with other more reasonable representatives.
The business partner should take the two members aside in a private conversation and try resolve their differences.
The situation could not have been avoided. The business partner does not have the required authority.
Submit

User Vlp
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The business partner could have avoided the personal antagonism by establishing ground rules for behavior in meetings.

Step-by-step explanation:

The business partner could have best avoided the situation by establishing ground rules for behavior in meetings at the first meeting.

By setting clear expectations for how committee members should interact and communicate with each other, the business partner could have prevented personal antagonism and interruptions during meetings. This would have created a respectful and productive environment for developing the program of employee appreciation events.

User Trampi
by
7.8k points