Final answer:
A residual plot should show a random scatter of residuals if the linear regression model is appropriate. Jorge's residual plot makes sense if it displays residuals randomly dispersed around the horizontal axis, supporting the negative linear relationship shown in the scatter plot.
Step-by-step explanation:
In statistics, a residual plot is used to show the residuals on the vertical axis and the independent variable on the horizontal axis. If the points in a residual plot are randomly dispersed around the horizontal axis, a linear regression model is appropriate for the data. Based upon the provided scatter plot with horsepower on the x-axis and observed MPG (miles per gallon) on the y-axis showing a negative correlation, as horsepower increases, MPG tends to decrease. This indicates that a linear model could be a good fit for this data.
The residual plot should typically show no clear pattern if the linear model is a good fit. If Jorge's residual plot shows residuals randomly scattered around the horizontal axis (with no clear pattern), then his residual plot does make sense because it supports the idea that the relationship between horsepower and MPG suits a linear model. Without seeing the actual scatter plot and residual plot, we cannot say for certain if the residual plot 'makes sense.' However, if the scatter plot shows a clear negative linear relationship, then a residual plot with residuals randomly scattered around the horizontal axis would confirm that a linear model is appropriate.