Final answer:
The morality of the same action can differ based on the ethical framework applied, such as utilitarianism focusing on consequences, deontology on adhering to rules, and virtue ethics on one's character. These frameworks provide varying perspectives on how actions are judged as right or wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to how the same action can be seen as right or wrong depending on the person's vocation, and we can approach its understanding through different ethical frameworks. For example, in utilitarianism, nothing is inherently right or wrong; it is the consequences of the action that determine its morality. If it produces the greatest good for the greatest number, it is considered the right action.
On the other hand, deontological ethics would argue that the morality of an action is based on whether it adheres to a set of duties or rules, regardless of the outcome. Lastly, virtue ethics centers around the character of the individual and suggests that the rightness of an action flows from having a virtuous character.
Questions such as human freedom of choice versus predetermined destiny, and conflicts between duties (e.g., lying to prevent harm), further complicate the discussion on ethical decision-making. Such dilemmas illustrate the challenges in resolving what actions are moral or immoral, showcasing that the evaluation of rightness may differ based on the ethical framework one subscribes to.