Final answer:
A 'Systematic' characteristic is not indicative of a well-written objective; this term relates more to the method of achieving the objective, not its inherent qualities. The true indicators of a well-written objective include being specific, concise, and measurable.
Step-by-step explanation:
Among the options provided, the characteristic that is NOT indicative of a well-written objective is 'd. Systematic.' While it is beneficial for objectives to be approached systematically during the planning and implementation phases, the term 'systematic' does not describe a characteristic of the objective itself.
A well-written objective should be:
- Specific: Clear and unambiguous, detailing precisely what is to be achieved.
- Concise: Short and to the point, without unnecessary words or fluff.
- Measurable: Quantifiable or able to be assessed in terms of progress and completion.
'Systematic' is more relevant to the process or method one employs to achieve an objective rather than a trait of the objective itself.