Final answer:
The Self-Determination Theory and McClelland's theory share commonalities in that they both focus on intrinsic psychological needs as motivators for behavior, including needs for competence/achievement and relatedness/affiliation. Both theories also downplay the role of external rewards in favor of fulfilling these intrinsic needs for personal and social well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and McClelland's theory share a common focus on intrinsic psychological needs that motivate individuals. Specifically, both theories highlight the importance of certain needs that drive behavior and engagement.
The Self-Determination Theory, introduced by Deci and Ryan, emphasizes three innate needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. McClelland's theory, on the other hand, posits that individuals are motivated by needs such as achievement, power/authority, and affiliation/intimacy.
Both theories suggest that individuals are motivated by needs such as competence/achievement, and relatedness/affiliation. Achievement, as described by McClelland, correlates with SDT's need for competence, where the desire to succeed and excel drives individuals to take on challenges and persist in the face of obstacles.
The need for affiliation/intimacy in McClelland's theory is similar to SDT's need for relatedness, where building connections and maintaining social bonds is essential for psychological well-being.
Moreover, these theories suggest that motivation is not primarily driven by external rewards such as cash/salary or promotions/advancements but by fulfilling intrinsic psychological needs. Both emphasize the role of intrinsic motivation in personal growth, social development, and overall satisfaction.