Final answer:
The Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 was quickly suppressed by the Federal government, marking a fundamental demonstration of the federal government's ability to enforce law and maintain order under the new Constitution. This event was distinguished from earlier insurrections like Shays' Rebellion which the government under the Articles of Confederation could not contain as effectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
The rebellion that ended differently from previous ones because the Federal government quickly thwarted the uprising was the Whiskey Rebellion. The Whiskey Rebellion occurred in 1794 and distinctly showcased the Federal government's ability to enforce its laws, marking a pivotal moment under the new Constitution. President George Washington personally led the militia to suppress the rebellion, demonstrating federal authority and averting the potential for disunion.
The uprising had been sparked by discontent with a federal excise tax on whiskey, which rural farmers saw as unfairly targeting their economic interests. However, the Federalists believed their decisive action in quelling the rebellion proved the strength and legitimacy of the national government, contrasting with earlier insurrections that were not as effectively addressed, such as Shays' Rebellion.
The outcome of the Whiskey Rebellion held significant political implications, as Federalists and Republicans interpreted the event through their own ideological lenses. While Federalists saw the suppression as a validation of their government's strength, Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, viewed it as an overreach that threatened democracy.