Final answer:
A narrow and factual research question limits research significance by leading to insignificant outcomes, suggestive bias, and a lack of openness to diverse viewpoints.
Step-by-step explanation:
A research question that dwells on discrete or narrow factual issues might limit the significance of a research project because it can lead to insignificant consequences, suggestive bias, and a lack of openness to multiple viewpoints. Research should aim at exploratory questions that open up a topic to a variety of perspectives and possibilities, facilitating a richer discussion and broader understanding. Choosing a question of little consequence may lead to results that are not particularly applicable or influential, thus failing to advance the field or contribute meaningful insights.
When formulating a research question, it's crucial to consider its scope and potential impact. The question should be open-ended enough to allow exploration yet specific enough to provide direction. If a question is too narrow, it may give the impression that there is a 'right' or 'wrong' answer, limiting the objectivity of the research and potentially swaying the direction of the findings based on the bias of the researcher.