152k views
5 votes
Subject to three upcoming constraints, provide the most support you can for the claim

(proposition) that people have moral rights over their legal property that make it
morally impermissible for the government to implement the policy?

Subject to three upcoming constraints, provide the most support you can for the claim-example-1
User Celine
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

People have moral rights over their legal property, including corporations, making it morally impermissible for the government to implement certain policies that infringe upon these rights. The interests of stakeholders should also be considered in relation to these moral rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the United States, the debate surrounding the rights of corporations has raised questions about the moral responsibilities of these entities. While corporations have legal rights, such as the ability to contribute to political elections or make decisions based on religious grounds, it is important to consider the ethical implications of these rights. People have moral rights over their legal property, including corporations, and this can make it morally impermissible for the government to implement certain policies that may infringe upon these rights.



For example, if a policy were to require corporations to act in a way that violates their religious beliefs, it would be morally impermissible for the government to implement such a policy because it would infringe upon the moral rights of the corporation.



Additionally, the interests of various stakeholders should be taken into account. Shareholders, employees, customers, and the community may all have different expectations of moral responsibility from corporations. It is important for the government to consider these various perspectives when implementing policies that may affect the moral rights of corporations.

User Le Hibou
by
7.9k points