Final answer:
The provided materials do not specify the costs associated with the visits of the King of England to an island. They discuss British parliamentary practices, colonial taxes, and reactions, as well as international relations, but not the specific financial aspect of royal visits.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question regarding how much had to be paid every time the King of England visited the island seems to be a historical inquiry, touching upon past practices and regulations during the time of English monarchs. However, the provided reference materials do not contain specific information about any costs associated with the visits of the King of England to an island. Instead, these references focus on various historical points such as the English Monarchy, the Triennial Act, colonial reactions to taxes, and international interactions with China.
British Monarchical Practices
From the references, we know that the Triennial Act stipulates that Parliament must meet every three years even if not called by the Crown, according to option c from Exercise 5.1.2. This does not directly relate to costs incurred by royal visits but outlines the regularity of parliamentary meetings.
Colonial Taxes and Reactions
Regarding taxes, the colonialists had methods of influencing British officials through the 'power of the purse,' which allowed colonial assemblies to control salaries and, by extension, sway royal government officials. With the imposition of new taxes, British officials were no longer financially dependent on the colonial assemblies, implying that financial transactions and obligations were changing between Britain and its colonies.
International Relations and Obligations
While the references discuss obligations such as the Korean tributary cycle to China or the English privateering against Spanish ships, they do not specify the costs associated with a King of England's island visits. Thus, it seems there may be no recorded information on this particular matter within the provided materials.