Final answer:
Evidence gathered during workplace procedures can be used to support professional claims, with the types of acceptable evidence varying by field. Documentation is essential for credibility, and evidence should directly support the claims of an argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
For uniformed employees, evidence gathered during various procedures can be used to support different types of claims or arguments within a professional context. As a rule, it is crucial to select evidence that is rooted in verifiable facts and firsthand experience. This evidence should also be aligned with the topic at hand and meet the instructor's requirements. Documentation of sources is also imperative to lend credibility to the evidence.
It's important to understand that different academic or professional fields may have varying standards for what constitutes acceptable evidence. For example, legal fields might require evidence such as documents or eyewitness testimonies, where scientific fields would rely more on experiments and statistical data. An English instructor, for instance, may prefer textual analysis as evidence, whereas a sociology instructor might look for sociological surveys or studies.
When choosing evidence, make sure it's consistent with the argument being made. For example, if discussing the effect of student seating on player performance in a college basketball game, evidence should directly relate to fan support and player morale, rather than how ticket sales might affect the university's revenue.
The type of evidence you choose, whether it is statistical data, logical development, analysis of texts or physical artifacts, directly affects the strength of your argument. The conclusions you reach should be supported by a preponderance of the evidence, especially when physical evidence might be lacking.