117k views
4 votes
What did the narrator mean when he said that natural resources had been a restraint in England but were a liberation for the Jamestown settlers?

User Playful
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The narrator meant that natural resources were seen as a limitation in England, while they were seen as an opportunity for the Jamestown settlers.

Step-by-step explanation:

The narrator is referring to the difference in how natural resources were perceived and utilized in England compared to the Jamestown settlers. In England, natural resources were seen as a restraint because they were limited and heavily regulated by the monarchy. The Jamestown settlers, on the other hand, saw natural resources as a liberation because they had access to vast untapped resources in the New World, such as fertile land and abundant timber, which they could exploit for their own benefit without the same level of restrictions.

User Gyuhyeon Lee
by
8.1k points

No related questions found