Final answer:
While Cathy Seldin's explicit attitude about silent movie acting is not given, an inference based on the context provided suggests a respect for the historical acting conventions of the silent film era and an understanding of how great actors adapt to the evolving standards of their time.
Step-by-step explanation:
\
The question does not directly provide information regarding Cathy Seldin’s attitude about silent movie acting. However, based on the content provided, we can infer that Cathy Seldin might have had an appreciation for the evolution of acting styles, especially given the context of the early 20th century. Silent films had a different set of conventions, and actors were often more exaggerated and expressive in their performances to compensate for the lack of sound. This would have been considered good acting at the time, appealing to the audience of the era.
By referencing the performances of silent film stars like Rudolph Valentino and their reception, it is suggested that while the style of acting may seem melodramatic to modern audiences, the energy and scale of these performances were praised and appreciated when silent films were at the pinnacle of their popularity. With the transition to talkies, styles evolved, and acting became more subtle and understated, in line with the new medium’s requirements.
In summary, the texts suggest that a figure with a mindset similar to Cathy Seldin would likely recognize and respect the shifting standards of acting performance, understanding that great actors adapt to the conventions of their time while maintaining a sense of originality and truthfulness in their performances.