495,781 views
45 votes
45 votes
Mya claims [m<3 + m<4= m<1, as shown in the triangle below. Which equations explain why Mya's claim must be true?

Mya claims [m<3 + m<4= m<1, as shown in the triangle below. Which equations-example-1
User Johnkol
by
2.7k points

1 Answer

25 votes
25 votes


m\angle1\text{ and m}\angle2\text{ supplementary angles}

We know that the sum of supplementary angels is 180 degrees.


m\angle1+m\angle2=180^o

Using triangle sum property, we get


\begin{gathered} m\angle2+\angle m3+m\angle4=180^o_{} \\ ^{} \end{gathered}


\text{ Substitute }180^o=m\angle1+m\angle2,\text{ we get}


\begin{gathered} m\angle2+\angle m3+m\angle4=m\angle1+m\angle2 \\ ^{} \end{gathered}
\text{ Subtracting m}\angle2\text{ from both sides, we get}


\begin{gathered} m\angle2+\angle m3+m\angle4-m\angle2=m\angle1+m\angle2-m\angle2 \\ ^{} \end{gathered}


\begin{gathered} \angle m3+m\angle4=m\angle1 \\ ^{} \end{gathered}

We get results by using the following equations. Mia's claim must be true from the following equations.


m\angle1+m\angle2=180^o


\begin{gathered} m\angle2+\angle m3+m\angle4=180^o_{} \\ ^{} \end{gathered}

Hence the answer is D.

User DylanT
by
3.5k points