Final answer:
The case of Carney vs Adams did not have a dissenting opinion delivered, as the decision by the Supreme Court was unanimous. Dissenting opinions are important for providing alternate interpretations of the law and can influence future cases.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case of Carney vs Adams, no dissenting opinion was delivered because the decision was unanimous. Typically, when there is a dissenting opinion, it is written by the most senior justice in the minority group. This justice also has the authority to assign another member of the dissenting group to write the opinion.
Dissenters in any case, such as Justice Stevens in a different case referenced, can express their views on the majority's ruling, providing insight into the decision-making process of the Court and potentially influencing future rulings.
It should be noted that the information provided seems to reference the case of Marbury v. Madison, which is a separate and landmark case establishing the principle of judicial review. This case demonstrates the complex nature of Supreme Court decisions, where justices must interpret the law and the Constitution, sometimes leading to divided opinions.