Final answer:
In Paul Piff's study, a rigged game of Monopoly was used, where one participant received more money, an extra dice, and double salary than the other, to simulate economic inequality and observe behavioral effects of perceived wealth and entitlement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The game was rigged in Paul Piff's study as a means to assess the psychological effects of perceived wealth and entitlement. In Piff's study, a rigged game of Monopoly was used as an experimental tool to observe behavior. One player was given significant advantages from the start.
For example, the favored player received more money, could roll two dice instead of one, and collected twice the salary when passing 'Go.' This setup created a scenario in which one participant had a deliberately unfair advantage over the other, thus simulating a condition of economic inequality.
The purpose was to observe changes in behavior and attitudes arising from an artificially imposed socioeconomic advantage.