25.3k views
3 votes
What level of force is allowed to stop others from committing evil? When is lethal force morally correct?

User Doak
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The level of force used to stop evil should be proportional to the threat, with lethal force morally correct only when necessary to protect life. The issues surrounding the existence of a supreme deity and moral evil are complex and debated. The ethical dilemmas presented in the scenarios range from morally obligatory to morally forbidden based on the principles of utilitarianism and the right to life and autonomy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Moral and Ethical Limits of Force

When discussing the level of force allowed to stop others from committing evil, several factors need to be considered, including the context, the potential for harm, and legal and ethical guidelines. Generally, the use of force must be proportional to the threat at hand, and lethal force is typically considered morally correct only when it is necessary to protect life from an immediate and significant threat. Regarding the existence of an All Powerful, All Knowing and All Good deity, the paradox of the coexistence of such a deity and moral evil is a deeply philosophical and theological question that has been debated for centuries.

As to whether violence in political revolutions can be considered treasonous or acceptable, this largely depends on the legal framework of the state and the perspective of those in power versus the reformists. Enlightened ideals have historically been implemented during revolutions, but their permanence and the necessity of violence varies with each situation. Ethically, conflicts between perfect duties, such as the duty to never lie versus the duty to avoid harm, are resolved on a case-by-case basis, often weighing the consequences of each action.

Lastly, the three scenarios provided illustrate different ethical dilemmas. According to utilitarian principles, 1) flipping the switch might be considered morally obligatory to save more lives, 2) picking up the child is seen as morally obligatory due to the minimal sacrifice for saving a life, and 3) taking the healthy person's organs is typically viewed as morally forbidden as it violates the right to life and bodily autonomy.

User Thotep
by
8.9k points