Final answer:
Both Cecil the Lion and Rainsford in 'The Most Dangerous Game' were hunted by humans for sport, but there are differences in the outcomes and impact of the two incidents.
Step-by-step explanation:
Both Cecil the Lion in Zimbabwe and Rainsford in 'The Most Dangerous Game' faced similar situations where they were hunted by humans. However, there are also differences in the circumstances and outcomes of these two incidents.
One similarity is that both Cecil and Rainsford were victims of sport hunting. Cecil was a beloved lion in Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park who was lured out of the park and killed by an American dentist for trophy hunting. Similarly, Rainsford, a skilled hunter himself, became the prey of General Zaroff on Ship-Trap Island. Both incidents highlight the cruelty and unethical nature of hunting animals for sport.
On the other hand, there are also differences between the two situations. Cecil's killing sparked international outrage and brought attention to the issue of trophy hunting. The incident led to increased efforts to protect wildlife in Zimbabwe and raised awareness about the vulnerability of certain species. In contrast, Rainsford's situation was a fictional account meant to illustrate the thrill of the hunt and the darker side of human nature.
In conclusion, both Cecil the Lion's story and Rainsford's experience in 'The Most Dangerous Game' involve the hunting of animals for sport. Both instances highlight the ethical concerns surrounding hunting, but Cecil's story had a real-world impact in terms of conservation efforts, while Rainsford's story is a work of fiction examining themes of human morality.