Final answer:
In literature, a seer's infinite foresight might symbolize the complexity of fate, with no specific 'too much' threshold, but rather an emphasis on the effects of such knowledge. Prophetic visions are often seen as a double-edged sword, offering insight but also presenting burden.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a seer could see into the future and beheld the vision of themselves seeing the future, which then extends into an infinite regress of 'seeing the future,' one might argue that there's no concrete number of times that could be considered 'too much.' In literature, the concept of seeing the future or experiencing visions is often tied to themes of fate, destiny, and the human psyche. The idea of an infinite loop of foresight might symbolize the unending nature of time or the unfathomable complexity of foreseeing the twists and turns of fate.
Consider prophets or oracles in literature; they sometimes struggle with the burden of their foresight, suggesting there can be such a thing as knowing too much, or that exceeding a certain limit in insight can turn from a gift to a curse. When considering the prophetic visions described in classical literature, particularly those in which characters grapple with their knowledge or perception of the future, it becomes evident that the 'too much' threshold is not necessarily defined by a specific number but by the effect such knowledge has on the individual or those around them.
Understanding the implications of these visions, whether enlightening or maddening, is a consistent thread that runs through narratives that tackle the subject of precognition. Hence, we come to understand that prophetic vision is frequently depicted as a double-edged sword – illuminating yet burdensome, coveted yet feared.