Final answer:
Tiger 2 could be an image of Tiger 1 after one reflection if the mirrors are oriented correctly. Each reflection in a mirror results in a lateral inversion, and in the case of a double reflection, additional images can form. The final image's orientation is dependent on mirror positioning and angle of incidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
To answer whether Tiger 2 could be an image of Tiger 1 after one reflection, it is essential to understand the principles of reflection as they apply to mirrors. If we're considering a scenario with a flat mirror, a single reflection in the mirror can produce a virtual image that seems to appear behind the mirror. Based on the law of reflection, which states that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, a virtual image produced will be laterally inverted. This means left becomes right and vice versa; however, the image remains upright, not flipped vertically.
In the case of a double reflection, such as with two mirrors at a right angle, reflections from both mirrors can combine to create an additional image, referred to as image 1,2. This is because rays reflecting from the first mirror can then become subject to reflection in the second mirror, resulting in multiple images being visible. It is important to note that each reflection reverses front and back, further changing the orientation of the resulting images.
Therefore, if Tiger 2 is merely meant to represent an object after a single reflection, and the angles and orientations of the mirrors support this, then it can be an image of Tiger 1. However, the specifics of the orientation of the mirrors and the positions of the objects play a crucial role in determining the exact nature of the images formed.