Final answer:
The statement is false; standard black and rich black look different and can have different printing costs. Rich black uses more ink which can be costlier, while standard black uses only black ink. The choice between them depends on visual needs and budget.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that standard and rich black look different when printed, but ultimately cost the same to print is false. Standard black uses only the black ink (K in CMYK), whereas rich black is created using a combination of black, cyan, magenta, and yellow inks. Printing with rich black typically involves more ink usage and can lead to a higher printing cost, especially for printers that charge by ink coverage. When images are printed on paper, the use of rich black can provide a deeper, more saturated black color, which is desirable for full-color images and areas of solid black.Printers, like inkjet printers, can produce color images by using a combination of primary colors cyan, magenta, and yellow, plus black – a four-color process known as CMYK printing. This is more complex in xerographic printers (laser printers), which may require multiple drums and toners to achieve the same result.The choice between standard and rich black depends on the visual requirements and budget constraints of the print job. For example, if a print job involves full-color images on high-quality paper, rich black might be selected for its visual impact despite its higher cost. On the other hand, if cost is a primary concern or if images with solid blacks are not critical to the design, standard black may be the more economical option.